From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <7871fcf50807141837t62a15397s6db86a20d031941e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:37:22 -0400 From: "Joel C. Salomon" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: <1216067581.14715.45.camel@goose.sun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1216067581.14715.45.camel@goose.sun.com> Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 and multicores/parallelism/concurrency? Topicbox-Message-UUID: e6eff35e-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik wrote: > the day. I don't think that Plan9 scheduler has had an > opportunity to be tuned for such an environment. Same goes for > virtual memory page related algorithms. The scheduling code does have a heuristic for processor affinity, so there's a model for what to tune when you have the MSMP machine to play with. --Joel