From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <788ac2c09f34fc1a4ce43b2316581314@vitanuova.com> From: C H Forsyth Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:25:30 +0100 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] floatfmt on 64-bit targets? In-Reply-To: <20051025215838.GA3159@mero.morphisms.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-mdwbpfqznlftoxipryehoysyti" Topicbox-Message-UUID: a017ca5e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-mdwbpfqznlftoxipryehoysyti Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit was that on Plan 9 or plan 9 ports (and if so, which platform)? --upas-mdwbpfqznlftoxipryehoysyti Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by doppio; Tue Oct 25 21:58:23 GMT 2005 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B4FED63C3E for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:59:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id EDF7C6361D for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:59:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07715-01-70 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from holo.morphisms.net (holo.morphisms.net [66.93.84.55]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 919E2635E3 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mero.morphisms.net (mero.morphisms.net [66.93.84.246]) by holo.morphisms.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5FF24FA9 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mero.morphisms.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A65D433; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:58:38 -0400 From: William Josephson To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Message-ID: <20051025215838.GA3159@mero.morphisms.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-No-archive: yes X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cse.psu.edu Subject: [9fans] floatfmt on 64-bit targets? X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=vitanuova.com@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=vitanuova.com@cse.psu.edu Has anyone run into problems with %f on 64-bit targets? With large numbers passed in to %f, it appears xdtoa overruns s in floatfmt. Has anyone already fixed this? --upas-mdwbpfqznlftoxipryehoysyti--