9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] In case anyone worries about block hash collision in venti
Date: Sat,  6 Feb 2010 23:47:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <78b9710340a6345eac9f8690d306e1bb@brasstown.quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.64.1002061338530.5454@malasada.lava.net>

> Sorry, this is all bunk.  You shouldn't be worried about
> an accidental collision.  You should be worried about
> an intentional collision.  Especially if your filesystem
> stores data that is under the attackers control such as
> email messages, web page caches, etc.  So what you need
> to analyze isn't how often an accidental collision happens
> but how hard it is to create an intentional collision.
> All the popular hash algorithms have been losing ground to
> attackers lately.

can you make this a little more concrete?  i'm having trouble
understanding how a email that an attacker controls is
a problem.  assuming the attacker can predict the headers
add well enough, this implies that the attacker, given access to
your venti, can retrieve an email said attacker sent.  where's
the problem?  i don't see it yet.

- erik



  reply	other threads:[~2010-02-07  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-06 18:47 maht
2010-02-06 23:42 ` Tim Newsham
2010-02-07  4:47   ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2010-02-07 16:54     ` Tim Newsham
2010-02-07 17:44       ` erik quanstrom
2010-02-07 19:12         ` Don Bailey
2010-02-07 19:24         ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2010-02-07 22:08           ` matt
2010-02-08 23:37             ` Nathaniel W Filardo
2010-02-09 13:13               ` hiro
2010-02-09 13:50                 ` ron minnich
2010-02-09 14:54                   ` erik quanstrom
2010-02-07 20:03         ` Tim Newsham
2010-02-08 21:58           ` Georg Lehner
2010-02-07 20:21   ` [9fans] In case anyone worries about block hash collision in Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
2010-02-07 20:31     ` erik quanstrom
2010-02-07 20:57       ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
2010-02-07 23:25         ` Akshat Kumar
2010-02-08  0:37           ` Russ Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=78b9710340a6345eac9f8690d306e1bb@brasstown.quanstro.net \
    --to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).