RE: [9fans] archmp

["Benjamin Huntsman" <BHuntsman@mail2.cu-portland.edu>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]

by the way, do many use Plan 9 on MP systems, or is it just there in-case?

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com [mailto:jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com] 
	Sent: Tue 11/23/2004 9:45 PM 
	To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: [9fans] archmp
	
	

	Of course, the other place a specific architecture has to
	deal with MP issues is the MMU. It's possible to make that
	really complicated, but Plan 9 skirts most of that at the
	expense of some performance and generality in odd cases.
	
	--jim
	


[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 292 bytes --]

from postmaster@ethel:
The following attachment had content that we can't
prove to be harmless.  To avoid possible automatic
execution, we changed the content headers.
The original header was:

	Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;
	name="winmail.dat"
	Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

[-- Attachment #2.2: winmail.dat.suspect --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 3590 bytes --]