From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <7F211805-9BA1-40AD-9373-36E62272B456@lsub.org>
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: "9fans@9fans.net" <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5H11)
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:35:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [9fans] Raw Input Driver
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c0c328bc-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I think it's possible. We have different apps.

El 20/03/2009, a las 15:30, rogpeppe@gmail.com escribi=C3=B3:

> 2009/3/20 Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>:
>> El 20/03/2009, a las 14:07, rogpeppe@gmail.com escribi=C3=B3:
>>> so you end up with a smart client or split application,
>>> which lack the same easy composability that you get
>>> from plan 9's remote devices.
>
> perhaps i should have written "generality and easy composability"
> there. i'm sure it's possible to make easily composable applications
> with other metaphors (octupus being one example) but is it
> possible to do so without making some strong assumptions
> about the user-interaction model of the application?
>
> [/mail/box/nemo/msgs/200903/36590]