From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7a7cd79d123658ed4c4619d53786cd35@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 05:46:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: <82af4df383dbdfc93944531f9ce11494@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx instability
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 45c7f9fa-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> so it is childish to replace 9load? or build a distribution that
> uses the stable and robust cwfs instead of fossil? write an
> audio layer? moving realmode and keyboard processing to userspace?
> unify the boot process to to break into rc shell, so one can
> at see what hardware got detected, poke at ctl files ect?

Is it out of the question to set up a CodeReview facility and apply it
to the entire Plan 9 source tree?  Maybe I ought to try it.

Is it too late to merge Plan 9, 9front and NIX by applying patches as
the Go Authors do with their stuff?

++L