From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lyndon Nerenberg To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> In-reply-to: <20181009190942.3A402156E40C@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <20181009001435.B6DDA156E40C@mail.bitblocks.com> <7aa1f60316858415@orthanc.ca> <20181009190942.3A402156E40C@mail.bitblocks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <77299.1539113421.1@orthanc.ca> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 12:30:21 -0700 Message-Id: <7aa1f6d215826bca@orthanc.ca> Cc: Lyndon Nerenberg Subject: Re: [9fans] PDP11 (Was: Re: what heavy negativity!) Topicbox-Message-UUID: e9f46f70-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Bakul Shah writes: And funny you should mention this! > Some of this process/memory management can be delegated to > user code as well. At $DAYJOB we would really like to have application process control over the kernel scheduler, as this seems to be the only realistic way to avoid the (kernel) resource starvation issues we run into. Our back end servers don't go down often. But when they do, it's for reasons entirely out of our control. Because those resource allocation policies have been pushed into the kernel, and beyond our control. --lyndon