From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7b32d82f3297154c5f7dab6a33d32a1e@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon,  7 Aug 2006 21:37:28 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Re: [9fans] timesync doubletime
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180608071846j5881c405r696eb4520a4fb762@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9935133a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i'm sure rebooting would solve the problem.  that seems like the easy way out.
there seems to be a real bug here, and i'd like to figure out what's going on.

were you using a multiprocessor?

- erik

On Mon Aug  7 20:47:05 CDT 2006, mirtchovski@gmail.com wrote:
> i've seen this behaviour before. start 'stats' and see whether it
> updates unreasonably fast/slow. reboot fixed the problem in my case
> and i've only seen it a couple of times circa 2003 or so...
> 
> > it seems to me that the problem must be in the kernel and sleep (thus the
> > kernel's fastticks) must be running too fast.