From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7c22175ab60f8a5ae2cf894d462b29e5@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:03:20 -0700
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920904200758m1a1a96den579673e107b57b19@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years
Topicbox-Message-UUID: eb25ca2e-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> 9p is efficient as long as your latency is <30ms

check out ken's answer to a question by sqweek.  the question
starts: "With cross-continental round trip times, 9p has a hard time
competing (in terms of throughput) against less general protocols like
HTTP.  ..."

http://moderator.appspot.com/#15/e=c9&t=2d