From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7ca391fa0b9cf1b3b72fb100981732a4@gmx.de>
Date: Sat,  3 Mar 2012 20:30:59 +0100
From: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <3856aed1f3999b912c4f9d74fd19356f@hamnavoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] duppage
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 66568a7e-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Jetzt verstehe ich.  Before returning 1 (failure) duppage
> always calls uncachepage first, so no harm is done.
exactly!

> How about submitting a patch(1)?
i think geoff is working on it.

i wanted to verify this first. the code is subtile and
there might be even better ways to fix this.

modified the pager and swap code in 9front in other ways
too. so making a patch for sources plan9 requires me do
do some manual recreation of the fix and bind fakery.

--
cinap