From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7cefbad7e6d7bd1c7fe0eb4d867631f5@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat,  3 Jan 2009 17:57:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1231022424.11463.231.camel@goose.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] directly opening Plan9 devices
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 76f4fda0-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> And finally, I'd say having these exceptions is a mistake. Unless,
> there's a really good reason, they break the paradigm of RFNOMNT
> quite needlessly without even a hint of a benefit.

so, it's likely that RFNOMNT was added and to avoid
breaking too many things, a few exceptions were added
with the intention of fixing and removing them.

why don't you submit a patch to rfork(2)?

- erik