From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <7d3530220611301719g119fb42cy474ff43b1d32d485@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:19:04 -0800 From: "John Floren" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] termrc changes In-Reply-To: <3a7ed6d28fc742ec5293884c2ca13ada@plan9.bell-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <3a7ed6d28fc742ec5293884c2ca13ada@plan9.bell-labs.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: e9781392-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 11/29/06, geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote: > I have not seen any of the alleged problems with swapping. I > certainly haven't seen freezing or crashing due to swapping. I have > seen one problem on one machine that may be attributable to a bug in > the VM code (or may reflect marginal hardware). Let's get together at > IWP9 and figure out if the alleged swap bugs are real or urban myth. > > I have experienced freezing due to what I assume is swap on two machines. Both had low memory, and would lock up completely when I was compiling a kernel and reached a certain swap usage (perhaps 30%). I didn't test the problem with anything else, so it could possibly be a problem in the kernel compilation procedure (I personally doubt it), but one machine had 32 MB of RAM and the other had 64, and both would only lock up once they had hit a certain swap usage. John -- Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn