From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <7d3530220612061709k1f9970cer3c425f39540cfe1e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:09:59 -0500 From: "John Floren" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: Again: (self)hosted Plan9? Was: [9fans] extending xen to allow driver development in Plan 9 In-Reply-To: <283f5df10612061656m5c8e277frc7ad2424990ff0c0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7d3530220612061355n74c7b80ne1093798e73c4e93@mail.gmail.com> <7d3530220612061653n57ecff6aw66349ed63a0edb92@mail.gmail.com> <283f5df10612061656m5c8e277frc7ad2424990ff0c0@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: ec0931cc-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 12/6/06, LiteStar numnums wrote: > [quote] > I think when Stallman did gcc and emacs, he wasn't so much in the > current state. Isn't emacs currently stalled, anyway, as he demands > that they fix /every/ bug in it? It's a very worthy goal, but the way > it sounds, he's doing it in a way that will make the next emacs > release years in the future. > .... > This is the same emacs that lost the leading '1' from it's version number > since it would never see the version '2' light of day... ;-) > I think perhaps the time is approaching to make the switch to xemacs. I've been wanting to get away from RMS's wacko crap for a while now ;-) John "Talks About Emacs on a Plan 9 List" Floren -- Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn