From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <7d3530220906241043n2a6e153ao259d4b4082c7020f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:33:09 -0700 Message-ID: <7d3530220906241633i1fdb3c27q7d389d998ef02e96@mail.gmail.com> From: John Floren To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil/venti falling down? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0ecb0386-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM, wrote: > =C2=A0/boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D78989 type got 0 exp 0: tag go= t > e63eb942 exp 663eb942 > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D99457 type got 0 exp 0: tag got > 150daf85 exp 150daf05 > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D68651 type got 0 exp 0: tag got > 66be7fe5 exp 663e7fe5 > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D166723 type got 0 exp 0: tag got > 3eabf0f9 exp 3eabf079 > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D134772 type got 0 exp 0: tag got > 7795335e exp 7715335e > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D155039 type got 0 exp 0: tag got > 19383bf exp 11383bf > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D155167 type got 0 exp 0: tag got > 19383bf exp 11383bf > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D155231 type got 0 exp 0: tag got > 19383bf exp 11383bf > /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D57147 type got 0 exp 8: tag got > 7bea015b exp 1ef0c892 > > why do i see the bits 0x800000 and 0x80 set in the bad tags, but > the rest seems to be identical? > > -- > cinap > That's interesting... So I went ahead and reinstalled fossil and venti--this time I went with a RAID-10 configuration on the Coraid. Now, on the first archival snapshot to venti, I'm seeing these errors: /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D4149 type got 0 exp 0: tag got fa5c83d5 exp 7a5c83d5 archive(0, 0x1035): cannot find block: block label mismatch /boot/fossil: cacheLocalData: addr=3D12511 type got 0 exp 0: tag got 5afe0bcb exp 5a7e0bcb archive(0, 0x30df): cannot find block: block label mismatch In both cases, it seems like a 1000 mask is being applied to a single byte in the "expected" number to get the "got" number. Russ, can you shed some light on this? John --=20 "I've tried programming Ruby on Rails, following TechCrunch in my RSS reader, and drinking absinthe. It doesn't work. I'm going back to C, Hunter S. Thompson, and cheap whiskey." -- Ted Dziuba