From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:14:38 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <7e11957adbf79eaf52503b801ba12af6@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120511205256.097d202b@gmail.com>
References: <D2A5C7470D67A54FACE86B838946D49D14E466F692@NJ4MSGSCR02.markit.partners>
	<CAMdzYRo0fg64MQykCkH2nHDSB=nOauTc66y+8pZGC-T+N9Ldfw@mail.gmail.c>
	<2618368964be9bae4cc045fff8c95781@coraid.com>
	<20120511205256.097d202b@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] IL depreciated
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8956ccbe-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri May 11 14:54:37 EDT 2012, 0intro@gmail.com wrote:
> > i can't think of anything that's inherent or fundamental to the
> > protocol. on the other hand, i don't use il over the internet since
> > it's not encrypted. tls over the internet makes much more sense to me.
>
> Can't you use TLS over IL?

i think tls only requires reliable, in-order.
it has it's own record layer.  so yes, good point,
i think you could.

- erik