From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7f085f360f023a33916061a56b26c515@terzarima.net>
To: quanstro@speakeasy.net, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 64-Bit programming model.
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net>
Date: Sat,  1 Oct 2005 14:52:17 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20050930190101.3CAC094755@dexter-peak.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9324f8c6-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

| but obviously enough ifdefs will compensate for everything, as usual!

> actually, i think it's worse than that. enough #ifdefs will make a given
> set of programs work, after much hand tweaking, but for each new
> program, you need to add even more #ifdefs.

i know.  i was being sarcastic, especially since i've been wading
(verb doesn't quite capture the feeling) through linux kernel headers and code.