From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <7f1d729e39aeaff3582d27f30de484a9@google.com> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] rio bug From: "rob pike, esq." In-Reply-To: <786097446c3f68f435e166932333b2d7@vitanuova.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:51:31 -0800 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3f73235e-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > to be honest, it should be quite fast enough if it just allocates new > windows every time it moves the border - that's what i did in the > inferno wm and it works fine, as smooth as you like. i tried that and the current code is a consequence of my inability (incompetence?) to get it to work. horrible lockup problems and other disasters. it was also slow, but modern machines are faster. i believe much of the old code was still in rio.c, commented out, until fairly recently. if you think you can make it work, please do. -rob