From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <7fa0cf86edd507da209feb6fe654a63e@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:55:31 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] impressive
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 461c8d90-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

last i ran gcc on sun machines (or aix for that matter), glibc was
not required.  admittedly this was four years ago.  have things changed?

- erik

On Tue Apr 25 19:54:59 CDT 2006, rvs@sun.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 05:48:00PM -0700, geoff@collyer.net wrote:
> > >From memory and a quick scan of gcc(1) since I don't have time to read
> > the entire manual ``page'' now, `gcc -ansi -pedantic' should compile
> > exactly 1990 ISO C and `gcc --std=c99 -pedantic' should compile
> > exactly 1999 ISO C. Using -pedantic-errors instead of -pedantic will
> > produce fatal errors rather than warnings for using extensions.
>
>   gcc *can not* claim full ISO C99 compatibility for the variety of reasons,
>   but the biggest one being -- glibc is not c99 complaint.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.