From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <80c5b75909ab54c1c7cc4d629e1c62f9@vitanuova.com>
From: C H Forsyth <forsyth@vitanuova.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:09:15 +0100
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <b89b3bf8af504576a2d3a9a1d126d3ab@quintile.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] APE: a further note.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 065a3f5e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> -T is great. But Python can't be built with it. Python explicitly
> creates functions with type signatures that don't match and this makes
> -T very unhappy.

the examples i had to fix (that didn't simply require
#pragma incomplete) were errors, for instance something like the following:
one function expecting a value in the middle
of a structure that was #ifdef'd out for another function's compilation,
because different #defines were in scope.