From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [9fans] CJK Support
Message-ID: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE056156@black.aprote.com>
From: "Tiit Lankots" <t.lankots@aprote.ee>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Date: Mon,  8 Dec 2003 11:51:09 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9c953a8c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> I don't think Chinese(C) Japanese(J) and Koean(K) should be called
>  So, please don't deal those three languages
> in a group.

I think what he meant was 'characters from the Unicode CJK Unified =
Ideographs block(s)'.
I cannot say if kanji equals jiantizi/fantizi in real life usage;
my japanese is not good enough to quote Koujien.

Tiit