From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <2522920406.enqueue@as-laptop>
	<0031c5cf57e92ce48e169455b02639be@quintile.net>
	<8oqsn9xcur.ln2@news.homelinux.net>
In-Reply-To: <8oqsn9xcur.ln2@news.homelinux.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <81EC7AE2-FED4-4508-8564-6DFA31BEDC03@bitblocks.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 06:54:54 -0800
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] c++
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e0d09362-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Nov 22, 2012, at 9:54 AM, Balwinder S Dheeman <bsd.SANSPAM@anu.homelinux.=
net> wrote:
> =20
>>=20
> Me, OTOH, would like see Go go out of fashion ASAP; What's so special a C/=
C++ programmer can't do what she/he can do with Go?

Is this opinion born out of experience with Go or due to a lack of experienc=
e? They are all Turing complete but if that was the only important criterion=
 most prog. languages wouldn't exist.=