From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <821e814a8e48ade52ba5584ce36376b6@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu,  2 Feb 2006 14:39:00 -0500
From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Van Jacobsen's network stack restructure
In-Reply-To: <14ec7b180602021024r29fa368cva515dda07bc320f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: efce6bca-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Feb  2 13:25:25 EST 2006, mirtchovski@gmail.com wrote:
> On 2/2/06, ems <oat@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> > I think what he was saying, is if you make the volume of 10 equal what
> > currently is 11 you would have the same effect, using different words.
> >
> 
> Well, it's one louder, isn't it? It's not ten. You see, most blokes,
> you know, will be playing at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up,
> all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your guitar. Where
> can you go from there? Where?

Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is if we need that extra...push over
the cliff...you know what we do?