From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <82af4df383dbdfc93944531f9ce11494@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 21:39:48 +0100 From: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de To: 9fans@9fans.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx instability Topicbox-Message-UUID: 451ad590-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 so it is childish to replace 9load? or build a distribution that uses the stable and robust cwfs instead of fossil? write an audio layer? moving realmode and keyboard processing to userspace? unify the boot process to to break into rc shell, so one can at see what hardware got detected, poke at ctl files ect? should have just put it in a tgz on contrib and expect someone to find it so we finally get some test coverage? sometimes, the plan9 boot cd doesnt even manage to get the kernel loaded thanks to 9load. 9front doesnt support 64 bit 10000 core machines for sure, thats what the real adults do! it only gets pc's booted into a graphical rio with audio support more often. these kidz from the peoples front of cat-v even managed to write some working device drivers! (OMG! LINUX!!!!) but this doesnt matter these days i guess, because we'll run our builds in p9p or 9vx on our shiny new macbooks instead. grow up cinap! grow up! -- cinap