From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Fri,  4 Dec 2009 15:58:32 +0000
From: weakish <weakish@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <82b69256-8752-4221-bff9-9cb45aa259f9@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <7c65d836-ce83-4fcf-967a-10a1cb2560b9@m33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc.vim rc shell vim syntax file
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a71758c4-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Dec 4, 12:06 am, jaketodd...@gmail.com (Jacob Todd) wrote:
>
> Which rc port? There's [1], which I thought I read people bickering about how
> it was different than Plan 9's rc.
> [1]http://rc-shell.slackmatic.org/
> --
> Jake Todd

Yes,  this version.  In fact there are not too much differences
(especially for syntax highlight).  For example, `word is not valid in
p9/p9p's rc, but since it is invalid,  p9/p9p users won't write this,
so they will not care about whether it get highlighted in another
version of rc script.