Re: [9fans] gnupg or pgp for plan9?

["Gabriel Diaz" <gabidiaz@gmail.com>]

Hello

May be it is easy to make upas plumb the signatures and encription to
other tool.

About the files, i think there are tools that will "compile" on the
three environments and will crypt streams of bytes (cat | crypt >
file.crypt ), i think that is the easier way :-? ( gnupg and those
tools are really big, and if you only need to interact with yourself.
. . or others with the same tool. . .)

gabi


On 3/28/06, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> i think a better route would be to build s/mime compatable signatures
> and encryption into upas/fs and upas/marshal so applications without
> a need to know would not have to know.
>
> - erik
>
> On Mon Mar 27 18:39:14 CST 2006, anothy@gmail.com wrote:
> > Fernan wrote:
> > // I am trying to get some sort of encyption. Protability between p9, linux and
> > // windows is a bit critical for my application ( I am paranoid ).
> >
> > pgp or gpg would be nice for portability, as well as for other things,
> > like signing mail. in the mean time, inferno's 'idea' performs the
> > IDEA encryption, which i believe is still considered quite strong.
> > it's available natively on each platform inferno is (can someone
> > confirm windows?), as well as within inferno itself.
>