From: "Gabriel Diaz" <gabidiaz@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] gnupg or pgp for plan9?
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:47:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82c890d00603280947y1094154dw334850658503e2b3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <facca0919a3c871e40ec39b28adccfa8@terzarima.net>
hello
because those tools support a lot of algorithms / mime / certificates, etc, :-?
if all you want is crypt a file and be able to read it between
windows. lunix, plan9 :-?
I doesn't mean those tools are big compared to ones with the same
functionality, may be i choose a bad expression, sorry. What i mean is
that those tools are bigger than one that just crypt a stream of bytes
with one algorithm you choose.
And compile that tool should not be too difficult in those three
worlds. Only valid if those files will no be interchanged with people
with other/incompatible crypt tools. May be i missed the point of the
thread :-?
gabi
On 3A28/06, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> > ( gnupg and those
> > tools are really big,
>
> why are they so big?
> silly question, probably.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-28 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-28 0:48 erik quanstrom
2006-03-28 14:59 ` Anthony Sorace
2006-03-28 15:23 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-03-28 15:57 ` Gabriel Diaz
2006-03-28 17:29 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-03-28 17:47 ` Gabriel Diaz [this message]
2006-03-29 0:27 ` Fernan Bolando
2006-03-29 2:49 ` geoff
2006-03-29 7:29 ` geoff
2006-03-29 2:07 ` Paul Lalonde
2006-03-29 3:17 ` quanstro
2006-03-29 3:56 ` Paul Lalonde
2006-03-29 9:09 ` Taj Khattra
2006-03-29 16:02 ` uriel
2006-03-29 22:03 ` Taj Khattra
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-29 1:13 erik quanstrom
2006-03-27 4:30 Fernan Bolando
2006-03-27 6:50 ` geoff
2006-03-27 7:25 ` Steve Simon
2006-03-27 9:18 ` Fernan Bolando
2006-03-27 13:10 ` Lluís Batlle
2006-03-27 17:26 ` Fernan Bolando
2006-03-28 0:38 ` Anthony Sorace
2006-03-28 13:59 ` Eric Grosse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82c890d00603280947y1094154dw334850658503e2b3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gabidiaz@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).