From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <82c890d00612282348n61c154c3h89d88c27bf91e734@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:48:40 +0100
From: "Gabriel Diaz" <gabidiaz@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Pull?
In-Reply-To: <20061229051124.20307.qmail@g.galapagos.bx.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e8da7f378bc8727a2690df2bead1bd11@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<20061229051124.20307.qmail@g.galapagos.bx.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fb92d918-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Hello

I've got the same problem too, pull -n shows that it want to remove  a
lot of stuff then, add a lot of files, should we let it do whatever it
wants or there is a way to re-sync the whole thing?

thanks

gabi


On 29 Dec 2006 00:11:24 -0500, Scott Schwartz <schwartz@bio.cse.psu.edu> wrote:
> | There was a problem locally wherein losing a file server connection
> | was making replica/scan think that all the files had vanished.  I've
> | taken measures to prevent it happening in future,
>
> What sort of measures?  I mean, is there a general purpose strategy that
> you used, or is this a special case?
>
>