From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <82c890d00712150945x4a023f91k5ba2678ae7a54fd9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:45:10 +0100
From: "Gabriel Diaz" <gabidiaz@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] imap4d and upas/fs
In-Reply-To: <892fd087cfb90d4e7267beeab36e2eff@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <82c890d00712150159kd57b31es2693b10af9272e4f@mail.gmail.com>
	<892fd087cfb90d4e7267beeab36e2eff@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 19ef0214-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

hello

oh, so upas/fs is the one which transforms the mailbox format to what
imap clients expect, i thought that would be done by the imap4d. . .

thanks

gabi


On Dec 15, 2007 3:39 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > is there any way of serving imaps without running upas/fs for each
> > mail box accessed on the server?
> >
> > i'm running out of memory.
> >
> > I saw that upas/fs is called from auth.c of imap4d with -np so, i
> > suppose it ill not use much memory (if i call it by hand it eats
> > 268K), but when imap4d execs it, i can't see any command line options
> > for fs with ps -a, but i can see high memory usage (depending on the
> > box i open).
> >
> > is upas/fs executed from other places i don't see? is anyone seeing
> > this or i missconfigured something?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > gabi
>
> unfortunately, this is the expected behavior.
> the only current solution is to have a smaller mailbox.
>
> - erik
>