From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun,  9 Oct 2011 23:21:22 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <83109255370bf46152ae8d1bb04a463f@chula.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <6C4DE0B7-6B44-4ABD-83A4-44E72A300DC0@gmail.com>
References: <ae8236023be4bc6186f1d6141c403be3@orthanc.ca>
	<6C4DE0B7-6B44-4ABD-83A4-44E72A300DC0@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme multi-line tags (or maybe,
	efficient message stores)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 35274038-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> didn't have the time to make that change.  That said, I find acme (and
> Edit in particular) damned near unusable without multi-line tags now.

do you have a particular usage senerio where this is most apparent?

- erik