From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 09:42:08 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <8315c32f99b4f17e3a78358f631a4993@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20120828150521.GA10731@intma.in> <20120828153548.GC11005@intma.in> <20120831222403.GA81150@intma.in> <0d2163b339e8b9211593ad0c636e070a@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh Topicbox-Message-UUID: b5f270d4-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > > I too believe that unless the mechanism of autocomplete is well-enough > > resolved, rc won't work for many people. I understand the reasons why there is no reason to put readline in the shell. i know i've got at least one readline implementation kicking around. > And good user interface is an another thing Plan 9 basically cannot into. i suppose that's a perfectly valid opinion, but p9p is pretty good evidence that not everyone agrees. - erik