From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <83653bd32ffffbb975cd81818a419455@plan9.bell-labs.com> From: David Presotto To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] is plan 9 based on XML? In-Reply-To: <378214d4b24f870a683cd4d88ea5b009@collyer.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-qoushuoxoiasvddekeuiqwaovg" Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 08:01:30 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 434db4ee-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-qoushuoxoiasvddekeuiqwaovg Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I used CTSS in the 1971/72, my first year at MIT. They gave undergrads spare time accounts on any systems there. It was at the end of its life, was way overloaded, and ran on a 7094 that stuck around for quite a few years later. It didn't have a hierarchical file system per se. Just a single level of directories. I can't remember how you named an other user's directory or even the system one. Multics fixed that and added much more. So, I went to see what I could find on the web... http://larch-www.lcs.mit.edu:8001/~corbato/turing91 is a nice read. --upas-qoushuoxoiasvddekeuiqwaovg Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from plan9.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.9.2]) by plan9; Fri Mar 26 04:00:48 EST 2004 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by plan9; Fri Mar 26 04:00:44 EST 2004 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 1D1AD19F13; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:00:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 951B419E62; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:00:38 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 3740419EF6; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:00:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from collyer.net (venti.collyer.net [63.192.14.226]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 9FC9519C83 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:00:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <378214d4b24f870a683cd4d88ea5b009@collyer.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] is plan 9 based on XML? From: Geoff Collyer In-Reply-To: <78f16f84fb0fd7bbd231afba600bce13@vitanuova.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 01:00:04 -0800 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on psuvax1.cse.psu.edu X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A google search turned up this claim at http://turing.cs.camosun.bc.ca/comp112/notes/chapter5.html: Among the first such systems (if not the first) was MIT's CTSS (Corbat=C3=B3 et. al) implemented on an IBM 7090. This was also th= e first system to implement a hierarchical file store (i.e. one with directories - aka folders - and files with them) --upas-qoushuoxoiasvddekeuiqwaovg--