From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_1CBBB639-DFFE-4CB0-8683-BC9C5150E981";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
In-Reply-To: <a342849135a77d556cdcf7f2b31c0c0d@jitaku.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:02:18 -0400
Message-Id: <837E7495-BA88-444B-AB4E-F6B98D839B69@9srv.net>
References: <a342849135a77d556cdcf7f2b31c0c0d@jitaku.localdomain>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] file server speed
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0320e5ba-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


--Apple-Mail=_1CBBB639-DFFE-4CB0-8683-BC9C5150E981
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

On Jul 15, 2014, at 2:13 , kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:

> I've experienced three kinds of Plan9 file servers,
> Lab's one, 9atom and plan9front.

Can you clarify which file server, specifically, you're comparing for =
each of these? The Labs doesn't distribute kenfs any more, and =
venti+fossil is a very different model. The old kenfs should reliably =
trounce it on performance. Then there's newer options in both 9atom and =
9front.

Anthony


--Apple-Mail=_1CBBB639-DFFE-4CB0-8683-BC9C5150E981
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAlPFJmIACgkQyrb52b5lrs7LzACdE8C+5uGCRzQkrAHi0Y+gsITA
RQQAn17YeWL7ZEUCGBvzSPxxG0/u4XcF
=9YK4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_1CBBB639-DFFE-4CB0-8683-BC9C5150E981--