On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Giacomo Tesio wrote:

> I've tried again and it worked by using a dynamically sized hd of 3
> GB ad using a 2 GB fossil partition starting at cylinder 1
>
> Don't ask me why it worked for a while (some minutes) and than
> crashed with similar messages.
>
> I suppose I've done it right, but I'm not sure.
> A similar procedure worked on QEMU, but it's by far slower.
>
>
> If you managed to get a Plan9 working Microsoft Virtual PC please
> tell me the procedure you used, the hd settings, the partitions and
> how you configured the mbr...
I just did everything with the default settings, which made me wonder.
I tried it out on a couple other machines, with varying success.
Certain machines worked fine, others had issues. I'm not sure why it
varies.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
> Giacomo
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Patrick Kelly
> <kameo76890@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 29, 2010, at 6:44 AM, Giacomo Tesio wrote:
>
> Hello 9fans!
>
> I've tried to install Plan 9 on a 64 bit Windows 7 using Virtual PC,
> since I've read that a related bug was fixed and noone tried it.
> I just announced it worked like 2 weeks ago.
>
>
> Actually, after the fourth tentative (after creating a fossil
> partition a bit smaller than the fixed size hd) I got rc starting by
> logging with the glenda user.
>
> BUT, after the rio start I got the attached error.
> I never had any problems starting up Plan 9 with rio, heck I never
> had any trouble at all. You sure you have everything set up right on
> your end?
>
>
> I'll use QEMU as I read it should work, but I hope this feedback
> could help.
>
>
>
> Giacomo
> <plan9-vpc.gif>
>
>
>