From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:32:15 +0000
From: Pavel Klinkovsky <pavel.klinkovsky@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <83c63c25-5d91-4bc1-910d-4e8402ccda40@g28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
References: <76824f16-1f1c-484a-a3f8-e73f7f568845@36g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Speed of 9pfuse on Linux
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d22b4ffc-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> 1) real plan9 to the same place
> 2) qemu plan9 on Fedora to the same place
As I wrote above, I made exactly the same test on exactly the same HW
(and internet connection).
1. Native Plan9.
2. Native Fedora 10 with p9p.

> "It's slow, what's wrong" is perhaps a little vague.
Not precisely measured (I can do it today).
My estimation of the time spent by 'ls' command in contrib directory:
- 9pfuse on Fedora was more than 10 times slower.

Pavel