From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <8413367b0512010316l7d309d3cg25d88d84ba507dc4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  1 Dec 2005 12:16:35 +0100
From: <grfgguvf@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9con in Madrid?
In-Reply-To: <438DBDA7.8080703@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <d5ae2d7ba321a734248768ea76d8c361@lsub.org>
	<599f06db0511220609v2de30122jdc22da1d10730ace@mail.gmail.com>
	<82c890d00511220712h180e73dfs@mail.gmail.com>
	<599f06db0511220716h78a9953eied442e5395ab5673@mail.gmail.com>
	<43834D99.5020808@lanl.gov>
	<20051130010547.GK9980@server4.lensbuddy.com>
	<438D89D9.1090306@anvil.com> <438DBDA7.8080703@lanl.gov>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b4957df0-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> >> Plan 9 development status, current projects.
> >> Plan 9 future development plans and goals.
>
> that one is kind of nebulous.

Am I the only one thinking everything Uriel says is kind of nebulous?

> >> Tech transfer to other systems(p9p, v9fs, ...)
> >> Inferno/Limbo
> >> 9grid and other global infrastructure
> >> Development process.
>
> user views.
>
> surviving with a plan 9 desktop in a linux/windows world

Anyone successful at this at all?

>
> what's missing in plan 9 that users want? how do we get it?
>
> 64-bit platforms

+ xcpu