From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
In-Reply-To: <39376.128.107.253.38.1111741146.squirrel@www.infernopark.com>
References: <04f5bec133668e161ed91685bdce4237@terzarima.net>
	<8bc166c91725d1028a2c3e6d8f9ed61d@coraid.com>
	<39376.128.107.253.38.1111741146.squirrel@www.infernopark.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <8463face56605776dc0535c8273b1f83@coraid.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Ad link
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 10:25:00 -0500
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2b65a4d8-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

We started with the idea to just do what was needed; do one thing
well, that sort of thinking.  We wanted to connect disks to local
systems so we just needed data link layer, not network layer.
We can still forward AoE thru tunnels if required and we don't
have to manage IP address spaces.  In fact, there is no configuration
for the blades at all, just plug them in.  You do have to set an address
for each shelf with dip switches.

On Mar 25, 2005, at 3:59 AM, vdharani@infernopark.com wrote:

> any reason why it is not AoIP (i mean ATA over IP)? that way it would
> be
> even more flexible. i am sure you have a reason behind but would like
> to
> know why you chose not to use ip. i think a skinny IP/UDP is a good
> choice
> too. i guess it is time to read the coraid paper!