From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 00:04:06 -0500 From: mischief@9.offblast.org To: quanstro@quanstro.net, 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <84fc5cb850d765cbf62ce486adfd59b8@sigma.offblast.org> In-Reply-To: <275b11f7b59c509c096d6adc193e6cd1@lilly.quanstro.net> References: <275b11f7b59c509c096d6adc193e6cd1@lilly.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-idztshxvcuucevgfxbxnjozvks" Subject: Re: [9fans] ethervirtio Topicbox-Message-UUID: 31d20c5e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-idztshxvcuucevgfxbxnjozvks Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 4.1.5.1.4.1 of the spec does say that a page is 4096 for the purposes of legacy virtio, but 2.4.2 just talks about pages. you think i should just use an explicit 4096 instead of PGROUND/BY2PG here? --upas-idztshxvcuucevgfxbxnjozvks Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.9fans.net ([67.207.142.3]) by sigma; Mon Dec 1 23:35:05 EST 2014 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=[67.207.142.3]) by mail.9fans.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <9fans-bounces@9fans.net>) id 1XvfCH-0001O1-MV; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:36:21 +0000 Received: from mr006.lax02.mailroute.net ([199.89.1.9] helo=in-mr006.lax02.mailroute.net) by mail.9fans.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XvfCH-0001Nu-2c for 9fans@9fans.net; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 04:36:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by in-mr006.lax02.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3js9QT2Kkxz12LrZ for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 04:32:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute X-X-Spam-Flag: NO X-X-Spam-Score: -0.011 X-X-Spam-Level: X-X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.011 tagged_above=-9999 tests=[SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from in-mr006.lax02.mailroute.net ([199.89.1.9]) by localhost (mr006.lax02.mailroute.net [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10024) with LMTP id aaw_qfj7wBUA for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 04:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lilly.quanstro.net (lilly.quanstro.net [50.251.227.249]) by in-mr006.lax02.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3js9QS26yyz12LFX for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 04:32:32 +0000 (UTC) From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:28:13 -0800 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <275b11f7b59c509c096d6adc193e6cd1@lilly.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] ethervirtio X-BeenThere: 9fans@9fans.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.9fans.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net Errors-To: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net On Mon Dec 1 20:17:56 PST 2014, mischief@9.offblast.org wrote: > hello, > > if anyone is interested in using or reviewing my ethervirtio driver, here it is. > > http://9.offblast.org/stuff/ethervirtio.c > > this driver was written for 386 and amd64 9front, but according to a short test i did a few months ago, it should work in the labs' kernel. it would be interesting to know if it works in 9atom too. > > i tested qemu 1.5, 1.7 and some version around 2.0. > > david (0intro) tested the driver on GCE a few months ago, and reported that it did *not* work. i don't recall what exactly happened, but the virtio device in GCE seems to differ from qemu's. > > if you run into trouble, you can mail me back or contact me on freenode irc, where my handle is mischief. what do you mean by PGROUND here, and BY2PG. do you really mean an explicit 4096 bytes? - erik --upas-idztshxvcuucevgfxbxnjozvks--