From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brantley Coile To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:59:22 -0500 Message-ID: <8593B51E-E9F9-4E68-BC24-DDC951362A5C@coraid.com> References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [9fans] c compiler bug Topicbox-Message-UUID: 57352b14-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I've a need for the pragma. We're using it. That's how I found the proble= m. bwc On Sep 14, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Charles Forsyth wrote: > since it's a pragma, i suppose it shouldn't affect correctness. > still, i don't know how far down this route i'd like to go. > i'd actually plump for disabling the pragma. > (realistically, most of the original reasons for it have vanished, > since so much stuff is in gcc or c++.) > still, what are you using it for? >=20