From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) From: "Federico G. Benavento" In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:42:08 -0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <868281BC-D579-4371-BC5F-98C5E3609BA0@gmail.com> References: <3692130.4DpTLt9QCJ@as-laptop> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] these are release of 9front? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 046188cc-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I don't think erik was suggesting a rewrite, just improving it=85 btw, in case anyone cares, I'm with richard on this. On Jan 8, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Matthew Veety wrote: >=20 >> the current usb stack can't do some things it needs to be able to >> do. it's particularly terrible at dealing with devices with = scheduling >> requirements. and it doesn't handle xhci. >>=20 >> - erik >>=20 >=20 > Well can't we just fix the problems with the current one? Most of the = work is already done. I don't see why we can't just use that.=20 --- Federico G. Benavento benavento@gmail.com