From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 20:43:58 -0700 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <86d46318dd8e5bf81a68a570991da5a7@lilly.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <87C61423-7C13-4516-88B5-C2ABA7D32AA9@me.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti performance question Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5011180e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Tue May 5 15:54:45 PDT 2015, aram.h@mgk.ro wrote: > It's pretty interesting that at least three people all got exactly > 150kB/s on vastly different machines, both real and virtual. Maybe the > number comes from some tick frequency? i might suggest altering HZ and seeing if there is a throughput change in the same ratio. - erik