From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <86f6e94bfde7a0471e286d975be19a73@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] suggestion: avoiding out of date binaries
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
In-Reply-To: <e977748f6b0a06306b3ecb39e5780c27@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:32:47 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b236516a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> As I recall, the compiler binaries other than 8c aren't maintained on
> sources, so you have to recompile them yourself as needed.

Then I'd suggest to keep them at least recompiled when getting out of
date. If that's automated as Russ said, it'd be easy to include other
compiler binaries too. They're small so I don't think it would be a problem.