From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: smiley@zenzebra.mv.com (smiley at zenzebra.mv.com) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:19:40 +0000 Subject: [9fans] Encrypting file systems In-Reply-To: (Jacob Todd's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:54:53 -0400") References: <86wrjivvi9.fsf@cmarib.ramside> Message-ID: <86hbako79v.fsf@cmarib.ramside> Topicbox-Message-UUID: c43efb7c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Jacob Todd writes: > There's two implementations that i know of: one is in russ' contrib, and > there another one called cbfs (i think), which is also on contrib, although > i don't remember where. The latter version could be russ' implementation > with changes, it's been a while since I tried either. Russ' didn't compile > at first, there were two variables with the same name iirc. I was able to find the former, but not the latter. Russ' "cryptfs" appears to be a modification of kfs. But isn't kfs one of the file systems that's now considered deprecated? How come crypto wasn't put right in fs(3)? It seems like doing that would give all disk-based file systems immediate cryptography support. Also, if you have any idea where I can find that "cbfs", please let me know... Thanks!