From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb+usenet@becket.net>
Message-ID: <871yehbxhk.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <20020318112543.B9ACA199B3@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: macro fun [Re: [9fans] plan or side effect]
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:37:18 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 68fe2672-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk writes:

> >> according to gcc, [t.c] is strictly conforming. it compiles
> > perfectly.
> 
> >That's not at all the same thing.
> 
> since he said -ansi -pendantic (or some such) i suspect he
> expected it to complain, and it probably should.

No, -pedantic says "issue all the warnings and errors that ANSI
mandates, even when they are stupid warnings or errors".  It does not
say "warn for all non-ANSI constructions".