From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb+usenet@becket.net>
Message-ID: <871yjc4hsv.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <20011105143517.77FB0199B5@mail.cse.psu.edu>, <200111051551.fA5Fp9o28322@skeeve.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Plan9 and Ada95?
Date: Tue,  6 Nov 2001 10:32:59 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 160c5da8-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

arnold@skeeve.com (Aharon Robbins) writes:

> >GNAT would probably come fairly cheaply once we had a port of GCC 3.0.
>
> Actually not.  GNAT is written in Ada, and thus there would need to
> be a cross-compilation boostrap done at some point.

Cross-compilation in GCC is a trivial matter.