From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb+usenet@becket.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan or side effect
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 10:04:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87664dv3gj.fsf@becket.becket.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C7F6F11.2A1CD8DC@strakt.com>
boyd@strakt.com (Boyd Roberts) writes:
> s/magic/stupidity/
The amazing thing is that you think performance is hugely important,
so much so, that you claim run time of compilation is the most
important thing. Then when another system does something faster, you
call it "stupid". Puhleez. If your real opinion is just "Whatever
Plan 9 does is brilliant, and anything different is stupid", then say
it, instead of pretending to have reasoned opinions.
For my part, Plan 9 does some things very well, and other things less
well. I enjoy learning from the successes of Plan 9, but it's a real
shame that many people here have a kind of allergic reaction to
learning from the successes of anything else.
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-04 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-28 17:41 David Gordon Hogan
2002-03-01 10:02 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-01 12:07 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-03-04 10:04 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG [this message]
2002-03-04 17:11 ` Sean Quinlan
2002-03-04 18:23 ` ozan s yigit
2002-03-05 9:41 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-05 9:56 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-03-05 9:43 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-03-08 17:30 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-08 18:00 ` Dan Cross
2002-03-11 10:04 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-03-11 10:04 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-14 9:56 ` macro fun [Re: [9fans] plan or side effect] ozan s. yigit
2002-03-15 10:18 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-15 10:18 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-03-15 17:48 ` ozan s. yigit
2002-03-15 18:40 ` Mike Haertel
2002-03-18 10:38 ` ozan s yigit
2002-03-15 18:42 ` Mike Haertel
2002-03-18 10:32 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-18 10:33 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-21 11:01 ` ozan s yigit
2002-03-18 10:33 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-03-19 9:49 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-03-21 11:01 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-03-18 10:38 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-03-20 13:38 ` Boyd Roberts
2002-03-18 10:38 ` ozan s. yigit
2002-03-18 13:08 ` Wladimir Mutel
2002-03-19 9:49 ` ozan s. yigit
2002-03-19 9:49 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-03-19 16:01 ` ozan s yigit
2002-03-01 11:57 ` [9fans] plan or side effect Boyd Roberts
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-08 19:22 forsyth
2002-03-07 13:45 rob pike
2002-03-07 15:47 ` AMSRL-CI-C
2002-03-06 10:24 geoff
2002-03-07 9:56 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-03-05 9:54 Fco.J.Ballesteros
2002-03-06 9:51 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-03-06 9:52 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-03-08 9:59 ` ozan s. yigit
2002-03-01 11:35 forsyth
2002-02-27 15:08 presotto
2002-02-27 15:27 ` Sean Quinlan
2002-02-28 9:58 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 12:51 ` Ralph Corderoy
2002-02-28 16:57 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
2002-02-28 16:01 ` AMSRL-CI-CN
2002-02-28 16:52 ` Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87664dv3gj.fsf@becket.becket.net \
--to=tb+usenet@becket.net \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).