From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <87a6b022f678167e1dca6bc8fffa6ddd@shike2.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Fri,  7 Nov 2014 08:17:55 +0100
From: k0ga@shike2.com
In-Reply-To: <3600f4a8554d9bc476742f16a142efcf@ladd.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] atexit() & atexitdont()
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 246fa580-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


> perhaps a linked list would make sense, but atexits(2) doesn't say which order
> the functions will be run in.  and it doesn't seem like a great idea to depend on
> atexits running things in a particular order.

POSIX says they must be called in reverse order.