From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <87fdb4b1be8930fcefef758f4a98e393@collyer.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] WRT54G Port? Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:46:36 -0800 From: geoff@collyer.net In-Reply-To: <78DDE11A-7C53-47AC-ACA7-16C32C42D06B@orthanc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-afogdfawvbmyxrduixbztgryrt" Topicbox-Message-UUID: d721764e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-afogdfawvbmyxrduixbztgryrt Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I believe it was inferno ported, by brucee, not plan 9. I would like to get either for the wrt54g. --upas-afogdfawvbmyxrduixbztgryrt Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from collyer.net ([216.240.55.183]) by collyer.net; Sat Jan 14 17:12:17 PST 2006 Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by collyer.net; Sat Jan 14 17:12:16 PST 2006 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 85619EE4D for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:12:11 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 1E8FB5C2B9 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:11:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15751-01-52 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:11:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from orthanc.ca (orthanc.ca [209.89.70.53]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id F0FEE5C1F5 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:11:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from peregrin.orthanc.ca (d154-5-28-131.bchsia.telus.net [154.5.28.131]) (authenticated bits=0) by orthanc.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0F1BmCV061000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:11:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from lyndon@orthanc.ca) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peregrin.orthanc.ca (8.13.5.Beta0/8.13.5.Beta0) with ESMTP id k0F1BBev004841 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:11:13 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <78DDE11A-7C53-47AC-ACA7-16C32C42D06B@orthanc.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> From: Lyndon Nerenberg Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:11:10 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cse.psu.edu Subject: [9fans] WRT54G Port? X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces+geoff.9fans=collyer.net@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+geoff.9fans=collyer.net@cse.psu.edu Once upon a time I thought I read that Plan 9 had been ported to said device. But now Google wants to prove me wrong. Did this ever happen? --lyndon --upas-afogdfawvbmyxrduixbztgryrt--