From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb+usenet@becket.net>
Message-ID: <87itc31syv.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <20011121233823.814D7199E7@mail.cse.psu.edu>, <3.0.6.32.20011122125948.00974e88@pop3.clear.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Nagle algorithm
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 09:57:11 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 278c00d8-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

andrew@mbmnz.co.nz (Andrew Simmons) writes:

> That makes sense, thanks. Not a problem for my application, but it's good
> to be aware of a potential problem.

(It should be noted that the same thing proved true of X applications;
Nagle isn't just bad for Plan 9 RPC's; it's bad for *any* RPC
application.)