From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <tb+usenet@becket.net>
Message-ID: <87u1t3larm.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <3C561EC9.88F86501@null.net>, <15446.32000.710318.879017@nanonic.hilbert.space>, <3C57AF73.727F8CE9@null.net>
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:35:24 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 49bb1ae0-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> writes:

> The "non-conservation of parity" work that was awarded a Nobel
> prize seems to actually have been confusion on this very score.

Um, the non-conservation of parity is part of the assymetry of certain
weak decay modes, right?