From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Georg Lehner To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] 9pm/Plan 9 kernel in user space References: <20061017233134.GA19696@debian31m> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 01:05:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Russ Cox's message of "Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:24:39 -0400") Message-ID: <87wt6x9qcz.fsf@jorgito.magma.com.ni> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: cd201834-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 "Russ Cox" writes: ... > You'd be better off just porting fossil (venti is ported) > to the current Plan 9 from User Space, which does > not depend on a central user-space kernel. ... Running fossil+venti on a Linux Kernel surely is an interresting alternative: more efficient then my first idea, plus the same benefit: lots of hardware drivers not supported in Plan 9. The idea of Plan 9 in userspace still attracts me for several reasons: - running Plan 9 alongside my Linux Desktop with reasonable speed - running CPU and Auth servers on Linux Servers with otherwise small workload=3D20 - doing same thing under Windows, eventually starting under Cygwin I'll look into drawterm. Charles Forsyth writes: >>"cl"? (Under Windows, you might expect your compiler to be called "cl.exe= ") > > plain cl is fine: it's just not in his search path > or perhaps not even on his machine cl is not on my machine, where may I be able to get it from? Thanks and Regards, Jorge-Le=F3n